Eu Trade Agreement South America

8:40 am Uncategorized

While professionals like Azevedo and Jean-Baptiste Boucher, COPA-COGECA`s communications director, say their members of the agricultural group across the EU are not yet advocating for abandoning the Mercosur trade pact, that could change quickly if it is not amended to allay their concerns. In the second half of the twentieth century, Latin American economies succeeded in promoting an autonomous and minimally interconnected industry. But when trade barriers increased – in the form of a market reserve that guaranteed protection – for domestic industry, they widened inequalities between industrial centers and the economic periphery. As a result, according to Brazilian economist Gustavo Franco, annual industrialization has led to recurring budget deficits and subsequent external debt, accentuated by the deteriorating global political and economic environment. Although industrialized, the continent survived the 1980s with stagnant GDP, fiscal stagnation, lagging economic activity, high unemployment, skyrocketing inflation, income concentration, and deteriorating general societal well-being. While few have noticed that the EU started talks with Mercosur in 1999, the revision of trade agreements has intensified since then, especially after the opening of negotiations on the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) with the US in 2013, resulting in mass protests. Although the agreement is a desire of the MERCOSUR countries to promote economic diversification and multifaceted economic development, the primary sectors of raw materials nevertheless represent substantial revenues in terms of income, employment and the State. Therefore, the multilateral integration of MERCOSUR into the world economy must support the promotion of its most competitive commodity sectors, without compromising education and the development of the secondary and tertiary economic sectors of its member States. The free trade agreement with the EU must seek to reconcile the immediate needs of MERCOSUR member states for raw material revenues with the need to attract strategic technology partnerships and modernise production networks (especially in disruptive sectors with high growth and innovation potential). The potential effects of the agreement on the environment are also worrying, in particular that it could be a setback in the fight against climate change. [14] The Amazon rainforest is one of the largest carbon sinks in the world.

[16] But the amount of carbon the Amazon absorbs and stores each year in the atmosphere has decreased by about a third over the past decade. [17] This decrease in the carbon sink in the Amazon amounts to one billion tons of carbon dioxide, more than double Britain`s annual emissions. [17] Since the election of Jair Bolsonaro as President of Brazil, deforestation in the Amazon has intensified. [14] Deforestation in the Amazon has not been as rapid in a decade, with deforestation increasing by 13% in 2018. [14] After twenty years of difficult negotiations, Brussels and Asunción have signed a treaty that is more complex than traditional free trade agreements. Engagement implies closer ties in the areas of intellectual property, investment, dispute settlement, sustainable development, removal of trade barriers of various types, government procurement, harmonization of regulatory practices, and transparency of government activity. . . .

Comments are closed.